3 ms·
It would actually be interesting to see if this phenomenon happens with clang, which has its own implementation of the standard library. And perhaps with musl l
by twic 7y ago
It would actually be interesting to see if this phenomenon happens with clang, which has its own implementation of the standard library. And perhaps with musl libc or some such.
- BeeOnRope 7y agoClang has its own libc++ implementation, but I think clang still uses the system libc and associated headers?
- twic 7y agoYes, i think so too. So a different <algorithm>, but the same <ctype.h>. The crucial __NO_CTYPE define is in <bits/os_defines.h>, which is part of the GCC paraphernalia. I don't know if clang's stdlib would also have to end up defining it.