> I guess that is the end of the naysaying really The whole “naysaying” (as you so insultingly put it) was never against encryption. It was always about putti

> I guess that is the end of the naysaying really The whole “naysaying” (as you so insultingly put it) was never against encryption. It was always about putting the user, the OS and network-operator in control of their own infrastructure, something the DoH-crowd dismissed entirely as a valid concern. So now that Microsoft has just provided that control, sure we’re happy. But don’t act like the complaints made by the “naysayers” weren’t 100% valid. The DoH-crowd was short-sighted, enclosed in their own echo-chamber and didn’t listen to feedback or criticism. This probably hurt DoH long term more than anything else. Now it’s by default “tainted” technology and people have already created and deployed firewalling solutions to block it. Those solutions are probably going to stay in place.