I'm a non-believer and I'm fine with the term "evil". There is no magicking here. Some people are unfit for society. We can cast them out, lock them up, extermi

I'm a non-believer and I'm fine with the term "evil". There is no magicking here. Some people are unfit for society. We can cast them out, lock them up, exterminate them, or (in rare cases) force them to behave. Funding is not unlimited, no matter how high we raise taxes. There is brutality in allowing a crazy evil kid to deny better people their education. We can't run society that way because an uneducated society is simply unable to sustain modern life. The cause of anti-social behavior is mostly irrelevant to the issue of what schools can or should do about it. It's not the school's job to fix youthful versions of Ted Bundy, Adolf Hitler, Osama bin Laden, Yang Xinhai, or Luis Garavito. The school can't do that. The school is supposed to teach children so that we can have an educated society. The good kids deserve to learn, and this is only possible if we focus our funding (staff, materials, rooms, etc.) on them while excluding those who would disrupt. I do not assume that vengeful retribution is misplaced, and I do not agree that retribution can only make things worse. Humans evolved the desire for retribution because it often works. Sometimes an actively bad person will shape up as a result, and many other people will be encouraged to continue resisting the urge to misbehave. Never mind vengeful retribution though. The value of isolating crazy evil kids should be obvious even if we have zero desire for vengeful retribution. By removing lost causes, we make education of other kids possible. The good kids deserve an education.