The meta of this article screams smoke and mirrors - The amount of space it devotes to pointing out how all of these former skeptics and people with all these q

The meta of this article screams smoke and mirrors - The amount of space it devotes to pointing out how all of these former skeptics and people with all these qualifications were now believers just sets off so many alarms. It's pitched in a way that appears crafted to disarm the readers bullshit-o-meter rather than presenting some information in good faith. Also stuff like this: >biotechnology expert Oded Shoseyov, a Hebrew University professor who has consulted for UBQ, says melting plastics and waste creates a homogeneous substance strengthened by fibers in the organic ingredients. Put simply: no. We know that if you just 'melt' all that stuff that is not the outcome. If done in an oxygenated environment you decompose the organic matter and break the long-chain hydrocarbons into oxygen-bonded carbons i.e. co/co2. If you do it in the absence of oxygen you turn the plastic back into short-chain/oil and the organic matter into char. Sometimes, a need to keep industrial processes confidential is understandable. When you're proclaiming to have a 'solution' such as this, it's suspicious.