No, my argument was that the description was market-speak and doesn't actually tell you anything useful. Faster than what? More secure than what, how? Its not c

No, my argument was that the description was market-speak and doesn't actually tell you anything useful. Faster than what? More secure than what, how? Its not class leading in either of those cases. Further the project is yet another CADT model project which further fragments a problematic portion of the ecosystem while bringing little to the table technically. And while I picked edk2/uefi, there are a dozen other firmware projects including one that actually does put a full blown OS in the firmware. So, if your augment is trying to be technical by saying edk2 does to much, that doesn't address boot loaders like uboot, while simultaneously failing to understand the why's of standardized boot-loaders.