3 ms·
> Speech is free regardless of the benefits and privileges granted to those who would speak. You're copiously misinterpreting my comment. Of course free speech
by throwGuardian 7y ago
> Speech is free regardless of the benefits and privileges granted to those who would speak.
You're copiously misinterpreting my comment. Of course free speech is an inherent privilege, nay human right, that doesn't require granting from any entity/authority figure. I'm very much questioning the logic behind their angst against Zucks' opinions on China. If anything, the free flow of information, free speech without retaliation and the general upliftment by being at FB should convince them to argue FOR free speech in China. I was hoping they saw the clear correlation between freedoms, free-speech, etc as the foundation for equitable wealth creation and prosperity, which they very much have experienced at FB.
I'm guessing their reaction is more visceral/emotional than logical. Most people tend to love their motherland despite it's shortcomings.
- mistersquid 7y ago> You're copiously misinterpreting my comment. Hm. I don’t think I misread or misinterpreted as much as your sparing comment leaves many lines to read between. In any case, I my inference does not match your intended meaning and I appreciate your clarification. Free speech should be an inherent right. I also LOVE the idea that such employees might use this as an opportunity to advocate for free speech in their hime countries. I don’t however see such advocacy as a requirement to criticize Zuckerberg.