That is stunningly bad, as far as "evidence" goes. I find it amazing that the rocks are so clear, and the snakes and bugs look exactly like the rocks. It's int

That is stunningly bad, as far as "evidence" goes. I find it amazing that the rocks are so clear, and the snakes and bugs look exactly like the rocks. It's interesting that the snakes and bugs don't actually look like snakes and bugs, and in order to see what he sees, you have to forget how clear the rest of the picture is and except his analysis at (blurry?) face value. Just like backward masking in music, or the word SEX toasted into your Ritz crackers and wrinkled into some girl's socks, it requires text arrows, shape outlines, and highly specific descriptions before you can just almost see/hear it. Imagine if National Geographic had to go through such extremes before we could see bugs and snakes in their pictures of them. On Mars, sometimes a rock is just a rock.