3 ms·
> ? Which of those aren't provided by edk2? What does that have to do with anything? Your argument was that the description was not descriptive but it was. So
by nickik 7y ago
> ? Which of those aren't provided by edk2?
What does that have to do with anything?
Your argument was that the description was not descriptive but it was. So your point was wrong and made no sense.
Then you start ranting about coreboot. So clearly your argument was not about the description, you just wanted to shit on coreboot.
And just btw, building a whole new OS to put under your OS is nonsense from pretty much every perspective.
- StillBored 7y agoNo, my argument was that the description was market-speak and doesn't actually tell you anything useful. Faster than what? More secure than what, how? Its not class leading in either of those cases. Further the project is yet another CADT model project which further fragments a problematic portion of the ecosystem while bringing little to the table technically. And while I picked edk2/uefi, there are a dozen other firmware projects including one that actually does put a full blown OS in the firmware. So, if your augment is trying to be technical by saying edk2 does to much, that doesn't address boot loaders like uboot, while simultaneously failing to understand the why's of standardized boot-loaders.