You miss the point of the slides. His point isn't about supervised vs unsupervised, it's about the general areas where AI seems to excel and fail. It's being us

You miss the point of the slides. His point isn't about supervised vs unsupervised, it's about the general areas where AI seems to excel and fail. It's being used to predict social outcomes where it does very poorly, may be inscrutable, and is unaccountable to the public. Your examples (deep learning applied to perception) are what he argues AI is generally good for.