3 ms·
Locking someone up for a dubious reason vs. Taking hundreds of unarmed police officers into the jungle, tying them up and executing them. Anyone who thinks t
by Lev1a 7y ago
Locking someone up for a dubious reason
vs.
Taking hundreds of unarmed police officers into the jungle, tying them up and executing them.
Anyone who thinks these are even remotely comparable acts is out of their mind.
- ryanlol 7y agoI don’t think “dubious” is the word I’d use to describe the reasoning here. I’d prefer to go with “malicious”, or perhaps just plain "wrong". I don't think the number of the executed police officers makes any difference, anyone who chooses to partake in an organization imprisoning people for such reasons deserves that fate.
- Lev1a 7y agoNot familiar with the local law, but it's most likely some BS law that's there due to some BS religious reasoning. If that's the case, campaign (hard but peaceful/non-violent) to introduce laws compatible with intelligent human life and expunge the records of/pardon those imprisoned due to laws reminicent of the dark ages. Being (one of hundreds of people) massacred by terrorists is not a fate anyone deserves.
- ryanlol 7y agoIt’s weird how you never hear such words in the defense of the thousands of nazi collaborators executed in Europe after WW2. I don’t think police arresting people for religious reasons should he viewed any differently. If you don't think the nazi comparison is apt you should look into Sri Lankan history, a decade ago the government was running literal concentration camps.