7 ms·
> Ms Persson said: "I would like to emphasise that the injured party has submitted a credible and reliable version of events. > "Her statements have been coher
by spodek 7y ago
> Ms Persson said: "I would like to emphasise that the injured party has submitted a credible and reliable version of events.
> "Her statements have been coherent, extensive and detailed; however, my overall assessment is that the evidential situation has been weakened to such an extent that that there is no longer any reason to continue the investigation."
Did Ms Persson also clarify that a lack of evidence suggests that the state consider that Assange may be the injured party. Presuming the accuser injured seems to deprive Assange of an assumption of innocence (not sure if applicable there).
Were Assange's statements not coherent, extensive, and detailed? If so, why favor the accuser? Why deprive Assange of fair treatment?
- erikpukinskis 7y agoNo, lack of evidence is not evidence of a lack of crime. Evidence is material. A lack of evidence by definition is not material.