3 ms·
Both of which are protection for SF, not for the user. Personally, I use a utility called 1Password, which means I don't use the same password for very many sit
by bradleyland 16y ago
Both of which are protection for SF, not for the user. Personally, I use a utility called 1Password, which means I don't use the same password for very many sites. My point is that for those who do use the same password for SF as well as other sites, this move doesn't protect them. It only protects SF.
In short, I disagree with the wording of the title. This does nothing to protect users, it only protects SF.
- nodata 16y agoWhat more could they be doing?
- bradleyland 16y agoNothing. The breach is over. And they should force user password changes. I'll say it again. I'm simply disagreeing with the phrasing of the title painting this as protecting users.