> Google isn't hosting the content nor have they stopped indexing and linking to it. That makes it pointless, ineffective, and minor, but it doesn't necessaril

> Google isn't hosting the content nor have they stopped indexing and linking to it. That makes it pointless, ineffective, and minor, but it doesn't necessarily make it not censorship though. In fact, that ineffective pointlessness is what the article is getting at. Why is it worth Google's and the Entertainment industry's time to do something so silly?