>> You are implying that an article that is only two years old is too old, > No. I’m stating that policy changed after this article was published, who knows ma

>> You are implying that an article that is only two years old is too old, > No. I’m stating that policy changed after this article was published, who knows maybe it was in response to this article, so the facts may have changed Ok, that was a more charitable and likely interpretation of your message. A bit of bad faith unfortunately slipped in my last comment. Sorry for that.