5 ms·
Very well written. It was odd how the article mentioned an improved rendering of Chicago's second largest building, and hyperlinked to the wiki page about the t
by dajohnson89 7y ago
Very well written. It was odd how the article mentioned an improved rendering of Chicago's second largest building, and hyperlinked to the wiki page about the tallest buildings in chicago (spoiler: it's the trump tower). Why not just refer to it by its common and well known name?
- lovehashbrowns 7y agoThey did in the title of the before/after graphic. My guess would be that they wanted to add emphasis on the fact that it's the second tallest building, making it seem like more of an omission. I.e how could it be missing the second tallest building in Chicago!?
- dajohnson89 7y agoI'll buy that, thanks.
- messick 7y agoWould anyone who doesn’t live in Chicago know there was another Trump Tower there? I for one thought all but the NY one had their names changed because the licensees no longer wanted to be associated with such a toxic brand.
- Chris_Chambers 7y agoYou still haven’t learned that the entire country isn’t as reddit as you?
- selectodude 7y agoIt's the 7th tallest building in the US. It's not an obscure building in the middle of nowhere.