> we now have evidence on the record showing that he coordinated this leak with Roger Stone at the behest of the Trump campaign.... He has absolutely debased hi

> we now have evidence on the record showing that he coordinated this leak with Roger Stone at the behest of the Trump campaign.... He has absolutely debased himself. I dont understand this view. So the logic being presented is if a journalist (or other) is presenting information of public interest, but it comes from a source that has a political (or other) motivation behind it they should then bury the story? I would understand this view if Assange also received information critical of the Trumps/Russia and refused to publicise it, but what was his alternative? > he's not really a journalist Then what is he? His format and method are different but essentially he is broadcasting news.