4 ms·
I have a slightly more capable one but the results are similarly motivating. Right now I'm more concerned with the particulate counts... if 27 is bad, does 120
by Psychlist 7y ago
I have a slightly more capable one but the results are similarly motivating. Right now I'm more concerned with the particulate counts... if 27 is bad, does 120 worse and going outside into 700+ me dumberer?
inside: https://www.uradmonitor.com/tools/dashboard-04/?open=82000090 https://www.uradmonitor.com/tools/dashboard-04/?open=8200009...
outside: https://www.uradmonitor.com/tools/dashboard-04/?open=82000117 https://www.uradmonitor.com/tools/dashboard-04/?open=8200011...
In the office at work is better: https://www.uradmonitor.com/tools/dashboard-04/?open=82000116 https://www.uradmonitor.com/tools/dashboard-04/?open=8200011...
When I was living in Lakemba this prompted me to rig a HEPA filter outside and run my bedroom at positive pressure. That helped a lot. But I've had to move for work so now I'm renting a cardboard box (ok, technically it's "fibro" on piles with a leaky wooden floor. Outside ~= inside)
- davidwihl 7y agoWhat device did you use to capture all the data including radiation?
- Psychlist 7y agoClick the "home" link on those pages to go to the uradmonitor home page.
- kardos 7y agoFrom your indoor page, CO2 min is 375 ppm. How did you get that below the atmospheric value of ~410 ppm?
- Psychlist 7y agoI have no real idea, especially because the outside unit is about 10m away and shows ~700ppm. I will try swapping them to see whether it's a calibration issue, but right now the outside unit is at work with me so I can open it up and take photos.,