3 ms·
You aren't really addressing the claims in the times story though. They didn't say FedEx had zero capital investment. They said there wasn't the promised increa
by jmull 7y ago
You aren't really addressing the claims in the times story though. They didn't say FedEx had zero capital investment. They said there wasn't the promised increase.
From the article:
> ...As for capital investments, the company spent less in the 2018 fiscal year than it had projected in December 2017, before the tax law passed. It spent even less in 2019.
So maybe you can argue that the times numbers are bad with some numbers of your own? Maybe you can argue with some numbers that this hub expansion is just getting started and over the next few years will represent a nice increase in capital spending? As it is, you aren't really arguing anything.
- ryanmercer 7y ago>You aren't really addressing the claims in the times story though I'm also not FedEx and am replying to a specific comment, that I quoted, in this thread and not the article. The construction is active, it has been active for over a year now. The IndyStar article also links to another article, with yet more construction, going on just south of Indianapolis at 259 million dollars. The comment I replied to stated >did not result in the capital investments promised I linked to one example, and referenced a second, of them actively carrying out those capital investments.