That’s also a straw man, since literally no one is making that statement. The point of contention is whether after arguing that a tax cut was needed to do capi

That’s also a straw man, since literally no one is making that statement. The point of contention is whether after arguing that a tax cut was needed to do capital investment, did the savings from the tax cut actually go to capital investment, or merely financial trickery of stock buy backs as the critics of the tax cut predicted. Literally everything else is a distraction.