> rural residents would be happy with cheap gravel roads they can afford doubt it. regardless, federal government revenue goes disproportionately towards fundi

> rural residents would be happy with cheap gravel roads they can afford doubt it. regardless, federal government revenue goes disproportionately towards funding rural services and welfare, including many services that city residents don't use at all. federal funding of a city's transport system would still not shift that balance. regardless, you missed the point of the parent comment.