> The law says they can access the river, but not that they can trespass to do it. I get being angry at them for the stuff they do while on the river or gettin

> The law says they can access the river, but not that they can trespass to do it. I get being angry at them for the stuff they do while on the river or getting to it but this interpretation is bullshit. If they're allowed access to a location but every piece of abutting property is owned by someone to exercise that right they HAVE to trespass somewhere.