>But "you can't have a site" is tantamount to "you can only say this if you find another private party willing to leave it on their site". This isn't really tr

>But "you can't have a site" is tantamount to "you can only say this if you find another private party willing to leave it on their site". This isn't really true though. Sure, not being able to find any hosting on the internet would mean no internet presence, but no one is stopping you from making a big sign and standing on a street corner, or using your PC and laser printer to print out a bunch of pamphlets full of your views. This is exactly what people did before the invention of electronic communications, and it worked. There's nothing in the 1A about free speech being easy or convenient or global in reach, just that the government can't pass a law abridging it.