4 ms·
> The first, dynamic linking exception, could maybe be patched up with some effort by FSF resulting in a new LGPL license. The Common Lisp world already has so
by pritambaral 7y ago
> The first, dynamic linking exception, could maybe be patched up with some effort by FSF resulting in a new LGPL license.
The Common Lisp world already has something like this, the "LLGPL"[1], but it's use is discouraged[1] because (among other reasons):
> 2. In 2004, the Free Software foundation affirmed that "the LGPL works as intended with all known programming languages" and that "LGPL contains no special provisions for inheritance, because none are needed." There is no need for the linking and inheritance provisions that are in the [LLGPL].
1: https://www.cliki.net/LLGPL https://www.cliki.net/LLGPL