3 ms·
It should be tiered, which it is but not to the degree that it sound. But really the problem is businesses and especially farmers growing non-essential crops,
by ping_pong 7y ago
It should be tiered, which it is but not to the degree that it sound.
But really the problem is businesses and especially farmers growing non-essential crops, especially in California. The drought we experienced over the last several years was mainly exacerbated by farmers who were growing non-essential but expensive crops like almonds. I would rather the almond farmers go bankrupt than have them spend 1 gallon per almond in water.
Businesses should pay more for water, and if it causes inflation in prices, maybe that's okay if the cost of almonds double. The amount of money that Nestle pays to bottle water for free is far too low. If it drives bottled water out of service because the costs are too high, I also think that's okay.
- samatman 7y agoAlmonds are a red herring where California crops are concerned. Around half of California's agricultural water use goes to alfalfa, a fodder crop which may be grown anywhere. Israel uses subsurface drip irrigation to grow almonds, which is more than ten times as efficient as California's flood irrigation system. The problem is not inherent to the crop; it is political, and downstream (pun intended) of California's approach to water rights.