27 ms·
Of course, a computer is an Actor ;-) This would be a joke except for the fact that Actors have been defined up to a unique isomorphism. See the following:
by ProfHewitt 7y ago
Of course, a computer is an Actor ;-) This would be a joke except for the fact that Actors have been defined up to a unique isomorphism. See the following:
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3418003
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3459566
- mgummelt 7y agoThat's an interesting result, but you'll have to connect more dots for me. I don't see how the existence of a categorical theory of Actors relates to what we're discussing.
- ProfHewitt 7y agoIf a computer is required to be an Actor, then we have a precise characterization of what it can and cannot do. Of course, an exact implementation of a computer as an Actor needs to be specified.