4 ms·
I think I've picked a bad example! I was thinking along the same lines you explained -- that the facts wouldn't be copyrightable, but the overall work might be
by philpem 7y ago
I think I've picked a bad example!
I was thinking along the same lines you explained -- that the facts wouldn't be copyrightable, but the overall work might be.
To that effect - the scan produces a point-cloud. If you repeated the scan, you'd get almost the same point-cloud. Thus, the point-cloud is a fact.
But the process of taking that point cloud produces a work, given the creativity involved in cleaning it up and checking accuracy, then making it into a model fit for release.
I was under the impression that the phone book's appearance and layout might be copyrightable (trade dress/look and feel), though that's more likely a trademark issue than a copyright one.
- thaumasiotes 7y ago> given the creativity involved in cleaning it up and checking accuracy This opinion isn't informed by anything, but I feel like the more effort you put into making sure your point cloud is accurate, the more fact-like and therefore uncopyrightable the point cloud becomes.