GP claimed that earnings outcomes were explained entirely by family wealth, thus implying that poor students attending top-tier universities should not expect t

GP claimed that earnings outcomes were explained entirely by family wealth, thus implying that poor students attending top-tier universities should not expect to find themselves climbing the socioeconomic ladder. This is evidently false. The fact that lower-income students have less access to top tier universities has no bearing on the outcomes of the students who do in fact matriculate there. (Also, accusing others of not reading their own links borders on the uncivil. Keep that out of this forum.)