4 ms·
There is a long standing tradition of companies funding "third party" groups with essentially the opposite naming to what they're actually lobbying for. FUD /
by zentiggr 7y ago
There is a long standing tradition of companies funding "third party" groups with essentially the opposite naming to what they're actually lobbying for.
FUD / message control / obfuscation is the name of the game.
Non-profits should be automatically named <sponsor>'s <name of group> - that would at least make it a little more obvious whose message you're getting.