3 ms·
> The mobile apps don't have grammar, but the web site does, for most skills in most languages. Ok, I’ve never been far enough on their website to see it (I mo
by tasogare 7y ago
> The mobile apps don't have grammar, but the web site does, for most skills in most languages.
Ok, I’ve never been far enough on their website to see it (I mostly test the mobile app). I’ll check it soon.
> Also, grammar is easy to get from other sites.
Which defeat using Duolingo in the first place. And no, some language have quite complicated grammar (Czech, Turkish, Finnish for instance) and somewhat lacking in ressources if your native language isn’t English.
- bayesian_horse 7y agoYou won't be learning a language from a single source ever. Duolingo is the most efficient for what it does, including teaching grammar, actually. Yes, it might help to have a more organized grammar reference, but Duolingo does make you practice grammar quite efficiently in my experience. For those complaining about Duolingo: Are there better routes? The convenience of the app, integrating audio, grammar and vocabulary are really hard to beat in terms of learning efficiency, even if you might have an in-person course.