3 ms·
Or you could just move the surface streets a couple of stories up like they did in the early 20th century in Chicago. Trucks (for deliveries, etc) are not allow
by spullara 7y ago
Or you could just move the surface streets a couple of stories up like they did in the early 20th century in Chicago. Trucks (for deliveries, etc) are not allowed on the surface, only below.
- djsumdog 7y agoA lot of early cities jacked up their buildings. Chattanooga did due to flooding. I somehow doubt such things could happen today considering the superstructure foundations under a lot of our modern buildings.
- spullara 7y agoDefinitely easier to keep the buildings at their current level and just make a new entrance on the second (or higher) floor.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- lmm 7y agoYou can't bootstrap having a nice walking environment at above-ground level that way. Who's going to open the first cafe where there's no foot traffic? Why will anyone spend a lot of money on entrances that no-one's going to walk to? What pedestrian is going to want to keep walking up and down stairs while the network is partially complete. The City of London tried to do what you're suggesting and it was a total failure, because while it might have worked if it could have magically all been done in one go, there's no way to get to there from here.
- cududa 7y agoThe only time cities have jacked themselves up is after fire or natural disaster. No way “underground deliveries” is scalable.