4 ms·
Each has a use case. dnsmasq has an easier barrier to entry, so I have seen people use it during prototyping before implimenting unbound/powerdns/bind etc, but
by arminiusreturns 7y ago
Each has a use case. dnsmasq has an easier barrier to entry, so I have seen people use it during prototyping before implimenting unbound/powerdns/bind etc, but often those can be much more complicated setups.
Most edge routers provided by ISP's are running dnsmasq on the underside.
- 9dl 7y ago>an easier barrier to entry I'd say opposite It had less examples and docs compare to unbound. At least that was my reason to setup unbound 2 years ago >Most edge routers provided by ISP's are running dnsmasq on the underside. True and sad