3 ms·
Wickard v Filburn isn't really relevant here because the Clean Air Act has a specific carveout for California.
by khuey 7y ago
Wickard v Filburn isn't really relevant here because the Clean Air Act has a specific carveout for California.
- mindslight 7y agoThe need for that carveout is predicated on the assumption that the federal government has the power to regulate internal Californian activities in the first place.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- treeman79 7y agoCivil war settled that question.