Interesting to skim through the PDF. Here's an excerpt from Section 3.1 which outlines the "most important factors" that influence Page Quality ratings. One th

Interesting to skim through the PDF. Here's an excerpt from Section 3.1 which outlines the "most important factors" that influence Page Quality ratings. One thing I found particularly interesting is that raters are encouraged to search for external sources to determine a website's reputation (one example they provide in the PDF is that Kernel.org should receive the highest rating for term "Linux Kernel archives" because of Wikipedia's kernel.org page vouching for its authoritativeness). --- - The Purpose of the Page - Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness: This is an important quality characteristic. Use your research on the additional factors below to inform your rating. - Main Content Quality and Amount: The rating should be based on the landing page of the task URL. - Website Information/information about who is responsible for the MC: Find information about the website as well as the creator of the MC. - Website Reputation/reputation about who is responsible for the MC: Links to help with reputation research will be provided.