I'm sure you studied a lot of accident reports and analyses. I'm sure you know the human factor plays a role in tons of cases. What I don't quite understand i

I'm sure you studied a lot of accident reports and analyses. I'm sure you know the human factor plays a role in tons of cases. What I don't quite understand is where you want to go from what you repeat again and again, pointing at supposed faults of the pilots, and then when more directly asked on the line if you are trying to diminish Boeing responsibility, you conveniently answers on the line of "of course not, I did not say there was no engineering problems". So yeah, maybe pilots did not do a critical step in a critical phase of the plane doing utterly stupid things trying to kill everybody, because of various economics factor that have been debated to hell. So... what? You know Air France is a reputable company. You know that the pilots of AF 447 did some really weird things in the cockpit. That does not make the pitot tubes used at the time less defectives. And MAX trim (and the whole story around it) is way worse than that. I mean common, were you not once subject to a high stress situation that made you fuck one thing? And even if you were, can't you also not understand some people react differently and the human factor must be taken into account?