2 ms·
The fact the discussion is about a table on Wikipedia, an encyclopedia, means we are at a stupid level. Which fits why we'd care about 'journeys' over anything
by aaron695 7y ago
The fact the discussion is about a table on Wikipedia, an encyclopedia, means we are at a stupid level.
Which fits why we'd care about 'journeys' over anything meaningful.
But if we pretend there's something to recover here, lets look at the source
"The risks of travel Archived September 7, 2001, at the Wayback Machine. The site cites the source as an October 2000 article by Roger Ford in the magazine Modern Railways and based on a DETR survey.
Data would be at least 20 years old, from a random website allegedly from a Railways magazine allegedly from a DETR survey.