4 ms·
> I cant imagine a logical thought process you could have gone through to conclude some people that you carve out would actually want less information I said t
by topmonk 7y ago
> I cant imagine a logical thought process you could have gone through to conclude some people that you carve out would actually want less information
I said the insurance companies would receive more information, and that would prevent those underinsured from being able to negotiate, lest the insurance companies find out. I don't understand how you could interpret it the way you did... And then you ironically question my ability to be logical, hoo boy!
And what does your link on the job market have to do with this?
- jakeogh 7y agoGiving individuals more information is unambigiously a good thing. The link has nothing to do with it, I only included it because you brought up skin color.
- topmonk 7y agoGiving insurance companies this information will make hospitals hesitant to give deals to those underinsured. Corporations will have access to this data, too, you know! > The link has nothing to do with it, I only included it because you brought up skin color. That's some weird reasoning you have there...
- jakeogh 7y agoWould you rather individuals not have this information? --------------------------- EDIT: (comment limit) Without price transparency, it's impossible to shop around. It's also the only way to actually drive prices down, when people have the freedom to shop around, the sellers that charge too much do not make money.