4 ms·

I don't think anything Uber did related to selectively ignoring laws when a new administration took office. How is any of this about large companies not caring

• scarface74 7y ago
  Well seeing that your question doesn’t have anything to do with the thread... My post: “ It’s not about the regulations, it’s about whether the executive branch chooses to enforce them and how much.” And the response to: “ That's really not true, you can't run a giant public company and start breaking laws because you think 'the current executive branch won't care'.” What does it have to do with “changing” the executive branch? The “executive branch” is not just at the federal level. It’s also at the state and the local level where the president/governor/mayor has a lot of influence on what gets enforced.
  • BubRoss 7y ago
    Ah, so now it's about state governments somehow and for some reason. It seems like every time you bring something hyperbolic and generally untrue that you can't back up, you shift to something else.
    • scarface74 7y ago
      Your thesis was that no large company would operate illegally because the law wasn’t enforced by the executive branch. Then you went off on a tangent about a change in the executive branch. Is Koch Industries not large enough?