4 ms·
It is adding incendiary meaning. You are assuming the intent of someone else not wanting politics in the workplace. You assume it means that they are content
by curryst 7y ago
It is adding incendiary meaning. You are assuming the intent of someone else not wanting politics in the workplace. You assume it means that they are content with the status quo and would like to maintain that.
The reality is that many people keep politics out of the workplace because they dislike the amount that bringing politics to the workplace can affect the cohesion of their team/department.
You're creating a strawman argument.
You clearly value the change that can be brought by bringing politics into the workplace. That's totally cool, your value system is different than that of some other people. All they're asking is that you take their viewpoint without assigning your assumed reasons to it.
- dredmorbius 7y agoThere is a distinction I'm being exceedingly careful to make between intent and effect. The meaning may be absolutely as you describe. The effect, however, is to perpetuate gradients in power, privilege, and control.
- mrkstu 7y agoThere are multitudes of venues for political expression, why cannot the workplace be a refuge from that maelstrom?