We need a real poli-sci explanation for why certain leaders are sticky Some people are just better at being despots than others, just as some people are better

We need a real poli-sci explanation for why certain leaders are sticky Some people are just better at being despots than others, just as some people are better at being actors, CEOs, basketball players or programmers. Give me unquestioned power over some tin-pot little country and I'd probably be chased out of my palace within two weeks. But a really good (in the sense of efficacy, not morality) despot knows just how to crush dissent among the masses using just the right amount of force while keeping all his generals (and anyone else with the power to depose him directly) dependent on a drip-feed of favours and constantly afraid of a knife in the back. It's a delicate balancing act, I'm sure, and some folks are just really good at it.