I'm curious about the actual arguments people are making. I could see a few, with most people arguing a mix of a couple: 1. People who politically disagree wit

I'm curious about the actual arguments people are making. I could see a few, with most people arguing a mix of a couple: 1. People who politically disagree with the work the company is doing should just leave. They do not have the right to resist or organize against it. 2. Google should just go along with anything the government does. If there's an opportunity for profit, Google should pursue it. If employees disagree, they should vote. Otherwise, see #1. 3. Google should have some moral tests, but the current situation passes the test. It's not as bad as people are saying. I honestly don't see how any of these are tenable. Number one is an argument against labor organizing in general, and the cats kind of out the bag there. Number two is just a variant of number one, and number three is inherently political—it's a situation where people see things differently, and the way we resolve those is politics.