3 ms·
Wikipedia is far from neutral and full of activists and people with agendas. It can sometimes be acceptable for a broad overview of a subject, but it's so full
by notadoc 7y ago
Wikipedia is far from neutral and full of activists and people with agendas.
It can sometimes be acceptable for a broad overview of a subject, but it's so full of opinion, inaccuracy, and misinformation that it should have near zero credibility for anyone who is seeking truth and bias-free knowledge. Appropriately, it has zero credibility in any credible academic environment BTW.
- adrianN 7y agoThere are no unbiased sources of knowledge. Wikipedia isn't special. Everything is written by humans and humans have their biases. That's why you shouldn't get all your information from a single source.
- kaycebasques 7y ago> The journal Nature says the open-access encyclopedia is about as accurate as the old standby. https://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-britannica/ https://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-bri...