Another poster addressed this as well, but: > You don't need Tor to unionize. Do journalists need Tor? Do lawyers? I suppose Tor specifically is not required

Another poster addressed this as well, but: > You don't need Tor to unionize. Do journalists need Tor? Do lawyers? I suppose Tor specifically is not required, but there are reasons why plenty of "normal people" need strong anonymity. Even if you discount state-sponsored surveillance[1], there are a ton of outfits who are willing to surveil you or your union drive, whether or not it is legal. But beyond all that, it simply is not your call to make whether or not I need anonymous communications. You don't know why I think I need them, and frankly you don't need to. It is enough that everyone should be able to make that determination for themselves. [1] Which, if you're unionizing, would be a serious error - there is a long history of less-than-legal state collusion in union busting in the US on top of the legal hostility.