4 ms·

Don't be. The DCMA is stupid, but the fact is, people DO post copyrighted material all the time, and it IS legitimate to take it down. We want people to copyri

by lukev 16y ago

Don't be. The DCMA is stupid, but the fact is, people DO post copyrighted material all the time, and it IS legitimate to take it down. We want people to copyright less, and for copyright laws to be reasonable, and punishments proportionate. Not to do away with copyright alltogether.

dtby 16y ago
We want people to copyright less, and for copyright laws to be reasonable, and punishments proportionate. Not to do away with copyright alltogether. For whom are you speaking when you say "we?"
kiba 16y ago
I just unlicense my stuff. I don't really care because I got paid anyway.
- forensic 16y ago
  >I don't really care because I got paid anyway. Right, and loads of authors won't get paid without copyright. So they need it.
  - kiba 16y ago
    They never even experiment with business model that doesn't relies on copyright.
    - tptacek 16y ago
      Those jerks.
jamii 16y ago
However, neither of the notices in the repo at the moment seem to be valid. Both are takedowns of circumvention tools which, as wtallis points out above, are covered in a different section of the DMCA to copyright takedowns.
albertzeyer 16y ago
How are the ps3 utils copyrighted? Isn't that all reverse engineered work?