3 ms·
Again, not for a question that has a defensible answer present when you're picking at random. (Uninformed prior.) If there is no defensible answer present, it'
by AstralStorm 7y ago
Again, not for a question that has a defensible answer present when you're picking at random. (Uninformed prior.)
If there is no defensible answer present, it's still not 0%, it's a paradox.
The answer is dependent on base axioms accepted. (Axiom of choice and axiom of regularity are a few.)
The answer set is Dedekind-finite and countable, whereupon probability is 1/logically consistent answers given the axioms chosen.
- shantly 7y agoWake up, check HN, see a lively argument about whether something that can't happen has a 0% probability of happening or not. Maybe I'll go for a walk.
- cyborgx7 7y agoOf course, a uniform distribution is implied. The fact that you choose to misunderstand this on purpose, doesn't make you smart or right. It makes you a pedant who is still wrong.