4 ms·
I guess the point of inflection on their user graph is about 2016? https://basecamp.com/about https://basecamp.com/about down the bottom
by mkj 7y ago
I guess the point of inflection on their user graph is about 2016? https://basecamp.com/about https://basecamp.com/about down the bottom
- NeedMoreTea 7y agoMy memory is probably a little earlier, but somewhere around the 2014-2016 range, when growth stops on that graph. Work stopped using the paid tier at the same time as they were looking at a huge 200 or 400%+ price increase. So I imagine it started quite an exodus of non-enterprise level users... Work ended up finding something better at less than the Basecamp old price, let alone the new ridiculous one, though we did have to try out a fair few to get there. :)
- wlll 7y ago> the 2014-2016 range, when growth stops on that graph That graph is "artistic" and doesn't represent reality. Check out this earlier, far more reality accurate graph: https://web.archive.org/web/20170701044638/https://basecamp.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20170701044638/https://basecamp.... You might not have liked the new pricing, but from memory signups only ever acellerated.
- wlll 7y agoAn older version of the graph gives more detail: https://web.archive.org/web/20170701044638/https://basecamp.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20170701044638/https://basecamp.... The two upticks in account numbers were when new versions of the products where released. I honestly forget which these were, 2 and 3?