3 ms·
> What you're basically saying is people wouldn't have driven their cars and stayed at Home if Uber wasn't a thing He didn't say that at all, read his post aga
by akdor1154 7y ago
> What you're basically saying is people wouldn't have driven their cars and stayed at Home if Uber wasn't a thing
He didn't say that at all, read his post again. He says that uber takes pedestrians and cyclists and PT users and turns them into car (Uber) users.
- mav3rick 7y agoGo back to pre-Uber. No one called expensive taxis and used private cars, including the cyclists for non trivial distances. Uber came and solved the first step. Maybe some cyclists even take it for trivial distances. But that's blaming Uber for a good product and promoting a protectionsist scheme. Rather if you want more pedestrians and cycling, have more infrastructure and incentives to promote that rather than ban Uber.
- mav3rick 7y agoFor all those downvoting ...what's the solution ? Go to phone call expensive taxis ? Uber is such a useful utility, most people won't let it go away. Too big to fail