4 ms·
An array can be appropriate for queuing for some things. You're wrong - as you are trying to state "a problem" has a specific solution, yet you don't know the p
by ukd1 7y ago
An array can be appropriate for queuing for some things. You're wrong - as you are trying to state "a problem" has a specific solution, yet you don't know the problem. Yes, there are situations when using a dedicated message broker would be objectively better; there are many when that's totally wrong.
Nothing is likely be correct about your arguments if you don't know what you are trying to fix or the sitation, which should also be blatantly obvious. You're applying some unstated subjective situation in your head, then dumping out something you've heard / done before. LOL.
Also "if you've ever used both" - I have, which is why I know. It's gray; sometimes you should, sometimes you shouldn't. You're assuming I haven't as I have differing point of view to you.
- dimino 7y agoNo, I'm assuming you haven't otherwise you'd know that redis AND postgres are inferior message brokers, both of them, and the fact that you haven't corrected me means you're not well versed at all in this problem domain.
- ukd1 7y agoLOL; what problem domain? We've not talked about any specific situation - which is why you're wrong; you assume far too much. I was attempting to enlighten you a little, but after a few redeliveries, it seems it's gone to DLQ.
- dimino 7y agoThe fact that you can't even recognize this as a problem domain means you do have zero clue what you're talking about. How about THAT?!? Thanks for making my point for me.