30 ms·
Also, consider the poor security track record of implantable medical devices [1]. From the source [2]: > The vulnerabilities could allow an unauthorized indivi
by SamuelAdams 7y ago
Also, consider the poor security track record of implantable medical devices [1]. From the source [2]:
> The vulnerabilities could allow an unauthorized individual (i.e. someone other than a health care professional) to access and potentially change the settings of an implantable device, home monitor or clinic programmer.
Ok cool, so there's millions of implantable cardioverter defibrillators whose voltages can be changed by someone who sits nearby at a restaurant. If they up the ampage high enough, the patient has a heart attack.
Now, what if I found out that a sitting president or other elected politician had a small electronic defibrillator implanted in their chest? We could see targeted assassinations look like medical device malfunctions when in reality someone learned about this device, built an exploit for it, and hired someone to sit within bluetooth range to deliver the payload.
It's not impossible to do. Unlikely, sure, but this is a result of the high-tech world we are living in.
[1]: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2019/03/25/medtronic-cardiac-implants-can-be-hacked-fda-issues-alert/ https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2019/03/25/medtronic-cardia...
[2]: https://global.medtronic.com/xg-en/product-security/security-bulletins/conexus.html https://global.medtronic.com/xg-en/product-security/security...