Because the simplest explanation is often the right one. Do you think it's more likely that some scamming group somehow got thousands of hours of the CEO's voic

Because the simplest explanation is often the right one. Do you think it's more likely that some scamming group somehow got thousands of hours of the CEO's voice, trained a world-class voice model, got internal info about how the CEO usually calls and requests transfers, found the correct employee to target, spoofed the incoming number... or was the employee's drinking buddy like "hey, just transfer X to this offshore account and say the CEO called you, we can pin it on that deepfakes stuff we saw in the news"? Or even more likely, CEO wants to embezzle some money so he makes a call for the transfer then feigns ignorance? If there was any sort of proof that this happened, like a recording, then sure. But there's no facts in the article other than "analysts suspect..." and an attention-grabbing headline. Maybe I'm just jaded but after everything that's happened over the last few years, but I take everything the media publishes with a grain of salt these days.