The work switching is nontrivial in costs and arrangement. There is some inherent in a "research what you need for your occupation" but it is specialized and d

The work switching is nontrivial in costs and arrangement. There is some inherent in a "research what you need for your occupation" but it is specialized and divergent over time. So while plumbers may learn to work with sonar robodrones once they come out and become the norm or doctors with nanoprobes if things advance the foundation often atrophies to not in fact being smarter than a 5th Grader. I am not sure how well it can be combined with work given that it is extrinsic to its many varied purposes that are already an incentives and strategic mess. The "best" way to enforce learning when it is fundamentally misalligned would involve a bueracratic gatekeeping hell sure to spark rebellion both overt and covert. Good luck in China let alone a liberal democracy. A less foregone dystopian way would be to subsidize general learning but even that would have opportunity and systemic costs that would limit uptake without obvious payback.